The Incarnate Word became obedient (Phil 2:8), and the Institute of the Incarnate Word not so much

Once again, the Institute of the Incarnate Word is at the center of controversy, this time in the figure of the controversial preacher Gustavo Lombardo and his supposed mentor in the shadows, Father Gustavo Nieto.

The Vicar for the Clergy of the Diocese of Phoenix, in the United States, confirmed in a letter that Father Gustavo Lombardo did not have authorization from the diocese to exercise the ministry. In addition, it was pointed out that his presence for the performance of spiritual exercises had not been notified to the bishop.

The Vicar also reported that he had communicated with the Provincial Superior, as no priest can carry out spiritual exercises in the diocese without the express permission of Bishop Dolan.

He also conveyed to the Provincial his concern about the activities of Father Lombardo in Spain, urging the Institute to review this matter.

The shadow of disobedience

It is striking that the parish where this lack of transparency has been committed has Father Gustavo Nieto, former Superior General of the IVE, as Parochial Vicar. It should be remembered that he was removed from his position by the Pontifical Commissioner, who requested that he disassociate himself from any government figure.

However, it seems that this request was not fulfilled, as evidenced by the recent foundation of the Shrine of the Baptism of the Lord in Jordan.

The former Superior General and his former government leadership traveled directly to receive the Shrine of the Baptism of the Lord on behalf of the Institute, without any authorization.

This fact reflects their persistent influence in the shadows, as they continue to exert control over the institution and act on its behalf.

Worrying patterns

This behavior seems to be repeated among the members of the Institute. An example of this is Father Lombardo, who carries out spiritual exercises without due permission. The Parish Priest, Father José Sylvester, also participates in this dynamic, a young priest who shows loyalty to Father Gustavo Nieto, who serves as Vicar.

The lack of transparency with the local bishop is worrying and is justified, apparently, under the argument of protecting the congregation from alleged unjust persecution.

This pattern of action is replicated in other priests of the Institute in different parts of the world.